Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Ç¥¸éÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼±¸Á¶ º¯È­°¡ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿ÍÀÇ ÀÎÀå°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

Effects of microstructural change of zirconia surface on tensile bond strength with resin cement

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀç·áÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 48±Ç 3È£ p.211 ~ 220
°­Á¤±Ô, ±èÅ¿¬, ÁöÁ¤Èñ, À̹ÎÈ£, ¹èżº, ÀÌÁ¤È¯, ¾È½Â±Ù,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­Á¤±Ô ( Kang Jeong-Gyu ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Dental Biomaterials
±èÅ¿¬ ( Kim Tae-Yeon ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Dental Biomaterials
ÁöÁ¤Èñ ( Ji Jeong-Hui ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Dental Biomaterials
À̹ÎÈ£ ( Lee Min-Ho ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Dental Biomaterials
¹èżº ( Bae Tae-Sung ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Dental Biomaterials
ÀÌÁ¤È¯ ( Lee Jeong-Hwan ) - Gwangju Health University Department of Dental Engineering
¾È½Â±Ù ( Ahn Seung-Geun ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Ç¥¸éÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼ ±¸Á¶ º¯È­°¡ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®¿ÍÀÇ ÀÎÀå °áÇÕ °­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇØ ¼öÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù. Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ °¡¼Ò°áü ºí·ÏÀ¸·Î 18¡¿18¡¿7 mm Å©±âÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» ÁغñÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ Æò±Õ ÀÔ°æ 0.65 ¥ìm Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ¿Í Åº¼Ò ºÐ¸»À» ÇÔÀ¯ÇÏ´Â Zirface ½½·¯¸®¸¦ 15%¿Í 30% ³óµµ·Î Àû¿ëÇÏ°í Á¦Á¶ÀÚÀÇ Áö½Ã¿¡ µû¶ó 1530 ¡É¿¡¼­ 2½Ã°£ À¯ÁöÇÏ¿© Ç¥¸é¿¡ ´Ù°øÁúÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼¿äöÀ» Çü¼ºÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®(PermaCem 2.0, DMG, Hilzingen, Germany)¸¦ ÀûÃþ ÁßÇÕÇÏ¿© 18¡¿18¡¿14 mm ½ÃÆíÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °áÇÕ·ÂÀÇ ºñ±³¸¦ À§ÇØ #2000 SiC ¿¬¸¶Áö·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ ±×·ì°ú 110 ¥ìm ¾Ë·ç¹Ì³ª 3±â¾Ð ºÐ»çó¸® ±×·ì¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­µµ ½ÃÆíÀ» ÁغñÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ ¸ðµç ºí·ÏµéÀ» ´Ü¸éÀû 1.0¡¿1.0 mm Å©±â·Î Àý´ÜÇÏ¿© 12°³¾¿ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» ÁغñÇÏ°í °¢°¢ÀÇ ½ÃÆí¿¡ ÀÎÀå½ÃÇè¿ë Ȧ´õ¸¦ ºÎÂøÇÑ ´ÙÀ½ ½Ãȿ󸮸¦ À§ÇØ 37 ¡É Áõ·ù¼ö¿¡ 10ÀÏ µ¿¾È ħÀûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌÈÄ ÁغñÇÑ ½ÃÆíµéÀ» Àç·á½ÃÇè±â¿¡ ÀåÂøÇÏ°í crosshead speed 0.5 mm/minÀ¸·Î ÀÎÀå·ÂÀ» °¡ÇÏ¿© ÆÄÀýÇÏÁßÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ç¥¸é Çü»óÀÇ º¯È­°¡ °áÇշ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ Á߽ɼ±Æò±Õ°ÅÄ¥±â Ra¸¦ cut off Ä¡ 0.25 ¥ìm Á¶°Ç¿¡¼­ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, Ç¥¸é Çü»óÀÇ º¯È­ ¹× ÀÎÀå°áÇÕ°­µµ ÃøÁ¤ ÈÄÀÇ ÆÄÀý ¾ç»óÀ» Á¶»çÇϱâ À§ÇØ °íÇØ»óµµ Àü°è¹æÃâ ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸ ·Î Ç¥¸éÀ» °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½ÃÇèÀ» ÅëÇØ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. ºÐ»çó¸® Ç¥¸é¿¡¼­´Â ±¹¼ÒÀûÀ¸·Î Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ °áÁ¤¸³µéÀÌ Å»¶ôÇÏ¸ç ¹Ì¼¼¿äö±¸Á¶°¡ »ý¼ºµÇ¾úÁö¸¸ Zirface ó¸® Ç¥¸é¿¡¼­ ´Â ´Ù°øÁúÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼¿äö±¸Á¶°¡ »ý¼ºµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2. Á߽ɼ±Æò±Õ°ÅÄ¥±â Ra °ªÀº ºÐ»çó¸® ±×·ì¿¡¼­ 0.848¡¾0.077 ¥ìm·Î °¡Àå ³ô°í ¿¬¸¶ ±×·ì¿¡¼­ 0.181¡¾0.045 ¥ìm·Î °¡Àå ³·°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, Tukey ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ¸ðµç ½ÃÇè ±×·ìµé »çÀÌ¿¡¼­ »óÈ£°£¿¡ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù (P<0.05). 3. ÃÖ´ë ÀÎÀå°áÇÕ°­µµ´Â Zirface 30% ó¸® ±×·ì¿¡¼­ 18.8¡¾5.4 MPaÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, Tukey ºÐ¼® °á°ú, ³ª¸ÓÁö ½ÃÇ豺µé°ú Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(P<0.05). 4. ÀÎÀå½ÃÇè ÈÄÀÇ ÆĸéÀ» °íÇØ»óµµ Àü°è¹æÃâ ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ¸·Î °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú, Zirface 30% ó¸® ±×·ì¿¡¼­´Â ·¹Áø ³» ÀÀÁýÆÄÀý°ú °è¸éÆÄÀýÀÌ È¥ÀçÇÏ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´Áö¸¸, ³ª¸ÓÁö ½ÃÇ豺µéÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °øÈ÷ °è¸éÆÄÀý ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î, ÀÌ ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼­ Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ Ç¥¸éÀ» Zirface 30%·Î ó¸®ÇÏ¿© ´Ù°øÁú ¹Ì¼¼¿äö±¸Á¶¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº Áö¸£ÄÚ´Ï¾Æ¿Í ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ® »çÀÌÀÇ °áÇÕ·Â °³¼±¿¡ ±â¿©ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù.

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of microstructural change of zirconia surface on tensile bond strength with resin cement. The zirconia partially sintered block was cut into a size of 18 ¡¿ 18 ¡¿ 7 mm, and then the Zirface slurry (DMAX, Daegu, Korea) containing 15% and 30% zirconia was applied and followed by sintering at 1530 ¡É for 2 hours. Resin cement (PermaCem 2.0, DMG, Hamburg, Germany) was applied on zirconia specimen and polymerized to prepare an 18 ¡¿ 18 ¡¿ 14 mm block. In addition, for comparison of bond strength, specimens were prepared for the group that was polished and the group that was blasted at 3 atm using 110 ¥ìm alumina. Thereafter, all blocks were cut into a cross-sectional area of 1.0 ¡¿ 1.0 mm to prepare 12 specimens. The specimens were immersed in distilled water at 37 ¡É. for 10 days for aging treatment. A holder for tensile testing was attached to each of the specimens, and then a tensile force was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to measure the fracture load. The fracture surfaces of each test piece was observed with a high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope. Through the above tests, the following results were obtained. 1. On the blasted surface, zirconia grains were locally removed but on the Zirface treated surface, a porous microstructure was created on the zirconia surface. 2. Arithmetical mean deviation from the mean line ra was the highest in the blasted group and the lowest in the polished group, and as a result of Tukey analysis, there were statistically significant differences between all test groups (P<0.05). 3. The maximum tensile bond strength was 18.8¡¾5.4 MPa in the Zirface 30% group, and as a result of Tukey analysis, there was a statistically significant difference from the other test groups (P<0.05). 4. As a result of observing the fracture surface after the tensile test with a high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscope, in the Zirface 30% group, cohesive fracture and interfacial fracture in the resin was observed, but the other test groups showed the interfacial fracture pattern. In conclusion, within the limits of this study, treating the zirconia surface with Zirface 30% to form a porous microstructure can contribute to the improvement of the bond strength between zirconia and resin cement.

Å°¿öµå

Áö¸£ÄڴϾÆ; ·¹Áø ½Ã¸àÆ®; ÀÎÀå °áÇÕ °­µµ; Zirface ½½·¯¸®
Zirconia; Resin cement; Tensile bond strength; Zirface slurry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI